Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for SYRACUSE CITY • Updated September 2026
Grade F — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
SYRACUSE CITY has serious issues in EPA's records: repeated health-based violations, unresolved violations, PFAS above the federal limit or lead near the action level. We recommend filtering drinking water.
Syracuse's tap water grades F on EPA's records. SYRACUSE CITY has 10 health-based violations in the last five years. Lead was 12 ppb at the 90th percentile. A certified filter matched to those issues is a sensible precaution.
Syracuse grades F. EPA records 10 health-based violations for SYRACUSE CITY in the last five years. The water is legal to drink, but a certified filter matched to these findings is a reasonable precaution.
SYRACUSE CITY's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31) was 12 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 116 UCMR5 PFAS results for SYRACUSE CITY (2024-09-11 to 2025-06-17) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
SYRACUSE CITY has 19 violations on file since 2016: 10 health-based in the last five years (1 still unresolved) and 1 monitoring or reporting violation in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
SYRACUSE CITY reports surface water as its primary source and serves about 192,000 people (EPA PWSID NY3304334).
We recommend one. An NSF/ANSI 53 lead-certified filter addresses lead.
Want to know what's really in your Syracuse tap water?
SYRACUSE CITY has 10 health-based EPA violations in the last five years.
Tap Score certified lab · Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
SYRACUSE CITY · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-09-07
EPA records 10 health-based violations for this system in the last five years, and 1 health-based violation is still listed as unaddressed or addressed-but-not-resolved. Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) or a required treatment step was not met.
| Violation | Category | Compliance period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Failure to Filter (SWTR)Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2025-03-30 | Unaddressed |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 | Archived |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30 | Resolvedreturned 2024-06-30 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 | Resolvedreturned 2024-01-11 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2024-01-01 → 2025-12-31 | Archived |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31 | Resolvedreturned 2024-01-13 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2023-04-01 → 2023-04-30 | Resolvedreturned 2023-04-07 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2023-03-01 → 2023-03-31 | Resolvedreturned 2023-03-25 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2022-12-01 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30 | Resolvedreturned 2021-11-12 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2020-12-23 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2020-11-01 → 2020-11-30 | Resolvedreturned 2020-11-22 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2020-11-01 → 2020-11-30 | Resolvedreturned 2020-11-16 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2019-03-01 → 2019-03-31 | Resolvedreturned 2019-03-10 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2018-12-28 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2017-01-01 → 2017-01-31 | Resolvedreturned 2017-01-11 |
| Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Treatment technique | 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29 | Resolvedreturned 2016-02-25 |
| Sample Siting Plan Errors (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Other | 2026-03-30 | Unaddressed |
| Monitor Coliform Turbidity Trigger (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2024-09-29 → 2024-09-30 | Archived |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-06)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by SYRACUSE CITY
Below the action level, but detectable. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31), 90% of the homes SYRACUSE CITY sampled had lead at or below 12 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31 | 12 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30 | 9 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2024-07-01 → 2024-12-31 | 12 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 | 70 ppb | Above the 15 ppb action level |
| 2023-07-01 → 2023-12-31 | 15 ppb | Above the 15 ppb action level |
| 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31 | 15.1 ppb | Above the 15 ppb action level |
| 2016-01-01 → 2018-12-31 | 9.3 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2013-01-01 → 2015-12-31 | 11.2 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2010-01-01 → 2012-12-31 | 14 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31 | 10.8 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2008-01-01 → 2008-06-30 | 14 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2007-07-01 → 2007-12-31 | 13 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-06)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2024-09-11 to 2025-06-17 · 116 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
No PFAS detected. None of the 116 UCMR5 PFAS results for SYRACUSE CITY were at or above the method reporting limit. Reporting limits are about 3–5 ppt, so “not detected” means below that threshold — not proven zero.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0 / 4 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 0 / 4 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 0 / 4 | < 3 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 4 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 4 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 0 / 4 | < 3 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
What PFAS are and how to remove them →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for SYRACUSE CITY · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples SYRACUSE CITY reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Every scored contaminant stayed within its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and averaged below 80% of the limit. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 80 detects | 0 µg/L | ND | 10 µg/LMCL | Not detected |
| Nitrate (as N) | 8 | 0.475 mg/L | 0.55 mg/L | 10 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Fluoride | 7 | 0.599 mg/L | 0.89 mg/L | 4 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Chromium (total) | 84 detects | 0.925 µg/L | 2.7 µg/L | 100 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Radium-226/228 | 10 detects | 0 pCi/L | ND | 5 pCi/LMCL | Not detected |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 144 | 30.165 µg/L | 64 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 144 | 21.292 µg/L | 41 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
SYRACUSE CITY · 38,601 service lines inventoried · Q2 2026 snapshot
SYRACUSE CITY reports 17,287 service lines that are lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement (45% of the lines it has inventoried), plus 16,098 lines whose material is still unknown. A lead service line is the pipe between the water main and a building, so treated water can pick up lead after it leaves the plant — which city-level testing does not capture. Under EPA's Lead and Copper Rule Improvements, utilities must replace lead lines within 10 years starting in 2027.
Source: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory (Q2 2026) · PWS ID NY3304334 · See all New York lead service lines. We may earn a commission from filters and test kits, at no extra cost to you.
Surface-water systems draw from rivers, lakes or reservoirs and must filter and disinfect, which is why disinfection byproducts (TTHM, HAA5) are the readings to watch.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Syracuse homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Syracuse faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Syracuse households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Syracuse ranks #5 of 5 graded New York cities.
Syracuse grades F. EPA records 10 health-based violations for SYRACUSE CITY in the last five years. The water is legal to drink, but a certified filter matched to these findings is a reasonable precaution.
SYRACUSE CITY's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31) was 12 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 116 UCMR5 PFAS results for SYRACUSE CITY (2024-09-11 to 2025-06-17) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
SYRACUSE CITY has 19 violations on file since 2016: 10 health-based in the last five years (1 still unresolved) and 1 monitoring or reporting violation in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
SYRACUSE CITY reports surface water as its primary source and serves about 192,000 people (EPA PWSID NY3304334).
We recommend one. An NSF/ANSI 53 lead-certified filter addresses lead.
SYRACUSE CITY has 10 health-based EPA violations in the last five years.
Most Popular for Lead
Filters rated for lead reduction
Waterdrop lead collection · direct from the manufacturer
Waterdrop's lead collection — every filter here is selected for lead reduction, so you can compare options rated for this exact problem.
Shop Filters Rated for Lead →Or a specific pick on Amazon
ZeroWater 10-Cup Pitcher
NSF 53 certified to reduce lead & chromium — no installation, the easiest way to start protecting your water today.
Check Price on Amazon →Whole-Home Filtration System
Whole-house system — treats every tap at the source
For consistently poor water, a whole-home system filters every faucet, shower, and appliance — the permanent, install-once fix that goes beyond a single point-of-use filter.
Explore Whole-Home SystemsNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Based on contaminants detected in your water, these resources may be helpful:
Find the right filter for your Syracuse water quality needs:
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.