Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for MADISON WATER DEPT • Updated October 2026
Grade C — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
MADISON WATER DEPT has a mixed record — read the reasons below; the deductions come from real EPA violations, lead results or PFAS detections, not from a template.
Madison Borough, NJ tap water is legal to drink but grades C on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling. A certified filter matched to that finding is a reasonable precaution.
Madison Borough, NJ tap water is legal to drink but grades C on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling. A certified filter matched to that finding is a reasonable precaution.
MADISON WATER DEPT's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31) was 2.55 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes. EPA's UCMR5 sampling (2024-10-07 to 2025-05-29) detected PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFOA, PFPeA, with PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt federal MCL. Reverse osmosis and certified activated-carbon filters reduce PFAS.
MADISON WATER DEPT has 12 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 6 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
MADISON WATER DEPT reports groundwater as its primary source and serves about 15,820 people (EPA PWSID NJ1417001).
We recommend one. Reverse osmosis or a PFAS-certified carbon filter addresses the PFAS result.
Compare filter options for your Madison Borough tap water
PFOA or PFOS was measured at or above EPA's 4 ppt limit in Madison Borough's UCMR5 sampling.
See the filters matched to Madison Borough's EPA results → — which certification actually removes what was found here, and what it does not touch.
Unsure which contaminants to treat? Compare home kits and certified lab testing before buying.
Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
MADISON WATER DEPT · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-10-16
EPA records no health-based violations for this system in the last five years. The 6 violations on file in that window are monitoring or reporting paperwork issues, not measured contaminant exceedances.
| Violation | Category | Compliance period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to ReportConsumer Confidence Rule | Other | 2025-07-01 | Resolvedreturned 2025-12-12 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Monitoring & reporting | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 | Resolvedreturned 2025-09-02 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)TTHM | Monitoring & reporting | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 | Resolvedreturned 2025-09-02 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)TTHM | Monitoring & reporting | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Monitoring & reporting | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Source Water (GWR)E. COLI | Monitoring & reporting | 2024-08-02 | Unaddressed |
| Monitoring, Source Water (GWR)E. COLI | Monitoring & reporting | 2023-08-16 | Unaddressed |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Chlorine | Monitoring & reporting | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 | Resolvedreturned 2020-08-15 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Chlorine | Monitoring & reporting | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 | Resolvedreturned 2019-09-15 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Chlorine | Monitoring & reporting | 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2016-12-31 |
| Monitoring, Source Water (GWR)E. COLI | Monitoring & reporting | 2016-07-13 | Resolvedreturned 2016-11-01 |
| Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to ReportConsumer Confidence Rule | Other | 2016-07-01 | Resolvedreturned 2016-08-18 |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-06)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by MADISON WATER DEPT
Well below the 15 ppb action level. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 90% of the homes MADISON WATER DEPT sampled had lead at or below 2.55 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31 | 2.55 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31 | 4.23 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2016-01-01 → 2018-12-31 | 3.97 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2013-01-01 → 2015-12-31 | 7 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2010-01-01 → 2012-12-31 | 2.14 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2007-01-01 → 2009-12-31 | 3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2006-01-01 → 2008-12-31 | 6.7 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 2003-01-01 → 2005-12-31 | 3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2003-07-01 → 2003-12-31 | 3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2000-01-01 → 2000-06-30 | 5 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 1997-07-01 → 1997-12-31 | 3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 1996-01-01 → 1996-06-30 | 10 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-06)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2024-10-07 to 2025-05-29 · 232 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
PFOA measured at or above EPA's legal limit in at least one sample. Utilities have until 2029 (2031 under EPA's proposed extension) to comply with the 2024 PFAS rule, so a result above the MCL today is not yet a violation — but it is the number that matters for your health.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 7 / 8 | 9.6 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 0 / 8 | < 3 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 8 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 2 / 8 | 4.9 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFBA | 1 / 8 | 5.1 | 5 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFHxA | 1 / 8 | 3.8 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFPeA | 3 / 8 | 4.7 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
What PFAS are and how to remove them → · Best filters for PFAS →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for MADISON WATER DEPT · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples MADISON WATER DEPT reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Every scored contaminant stayed within its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and averaged below 80% of the limit. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 8 | 1.276 µg/L | 1.6 µg/L | 10 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Nitrate (as N) | 3231 detects | 1.693 mg/L | 2.03 mg/L | 10 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Fluoride | 87 detects | 0.059 mg/L | 0.08 mg/L | 4 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Chromium (total) | 8 | 2.031 µg/L | 4 µg/L | 100 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Radium-226/228 | 62 detects | 0.445 pCi/L | 1.5 pCi/L | 5 pCi/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 128115 detects | 4.768 µg/L | 13.79 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 12866 detects | 1.115 µg/L | 11.48 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Lead (tap samples) | 9069 detects | 1.665 µg/L | 12.8 µg/L | 15 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
| Copper (tap samples) | 99 | 82.361 µg/L | 1037 µg/L | 1300 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
A point-of-use (under-sink) system typically runs $200-$600 installed; whole-house treatment $1,000-$3,000+ depending on flow and what has to come out. Tell us where you are and a certified water-treatment installer serving Madison Borough will follow up - no obligation.
Groundwater systems draw from wells; naturally occurring arsenic, nitrate, radium and uranium are the readings to watch, along with PFAS near industrial or military sites.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Madison Borough homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Madison Borough faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Madison Borough households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
What Madison Borough residents measured at their own tap. All reader results →
Reader submissions are unverified and shown separately from EPA data. They reflect one tap on one day, not the utility's compliance record.
No reader results for Madison Borough yet - yours would be the first. A hardness or TDS number from a $10 strip kit is enough to start the map.
Help build the first reader-sourced water map. Enter whatever your test strip, TDS pen or lab report shows - one number is enough.
Madison Borough ranks #69 of 155 graded New Jersey cities.
Deep-dive guides for the specific contaminants EPA data flagged in Madison Borough's water, with removal options for each.
Madison Borough, NJ tap water is legal to drink but grades C on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling. A certified filter matched to that finding is a reasonable precaution.
MADISON WATER DEPT's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31) was 2.55 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes. EPA's UCMR5 sampling (2024-10-07 to 2025-05-29) detected PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFOA, PFPeA, with PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt federal MCL. Reverse osmosis and certified activated-carbon filters reduce PFAS.
MADISON WATER DEPT has 12 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 6 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
MADISON WATER DEPT reports groundwater as its primary source and serves about 15,820 people (EPA PWSID NJ1417001).
We recommend one. Reverse osmosis or a PFAS-certified carbon filter addresses the PFAS result.
PFOA or PFOS was measured at or above EPA's 4 ppt limit in Madison Borough's UCMR5 sampling.
Most Popular for PFAS
Waterdrop 3-Stage Under-Sink
Lab-tested against PFAS "forever chemicals" — installs under the sink in minutes and costs far less than RO.
Check Price on AmazonCompare direct from Waterdrop
Reverse osmosis systems for PFAS
Reverse osmosis is the most thorough filtration class against PFAS — browse Waterdrop RO systems and check each model’s own tested claims.
Shop Reverse Osmosis Systems →Whole-Home Filtration System
Whole-house system — treats every tap at the source
For consistently poor water, a whole-home system filters every faucet, shower, and appliance — the permanent, install-once fix that goes beyond a single point-of-use filter.
Explore Whole-Home SystemsNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Based on contaminants detected in your water, these resources may be helpful:
Find the right filter for your Madison Borough water quality needs:
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.