Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL • Updated September 2026
Grade A — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL has a clean recent record: no health-based violations in the last five years and no lead, PFAS or historical monitoring result that costs it more than a few points.
Yes — by EPA's records Plantation, FL tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on no health-based EPA violations in the last five years and lead at 1 ppb (90th percentile, 2025) against the 15 ppb action level. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes — by EPA's records Plantation, FL tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on no health-based EPA violations in the last five years and lead at 1 ppb (90th percentile, 2025) against the 15 ppb action level. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-01-01 to 2025-12-01) was 1 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 116 UCMR5 PFAS results for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL (2024-06-04 to 2024-12-06) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL has 23 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 19 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL reports groundwater as its primary source and serves about 85,496 people (EPA PWSID FL4061121).
Not on the strength of EPA's data for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL. A filter still helps with taste and with lead from your own plumbing, which no city-level test can measure.
Compare filter options for your Plantation tap water
EPA data describes water leaving the plant — a certified mail-in lab test shows what reaches your own faucet, including lead from household plumbing.
Unsure which contaminants to treat? Compare home kits and certified lab testing before buying.
Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-09-13
EPA records no health-based violations for this system in the last five years. The 19 violations on file in that window are monitoring or reporting paperwork issues, not measured contaminant exceedances.
| Violation | Category | Compliance period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to ReportConsumer Confidence Rule | Other | 2025-07-01 | Unaddressed |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2024-09-01 → 2024-09-30 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29 | Resolvedreturned 2023-01-01 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Monitoring & reporting | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)TTHM | Monitoring & reporting | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Routine (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring | 2023-06-01 → 2023-06-30 | Resolvedreturned 2023-01-01 |
| Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RLead and Copper Rule | Monitoring & reporting | 2023-01-01 | Unaddressed |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Monitoring & reporting | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)TTHM | Monitoring & reporting | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularNitrate | Monitoring & reporting | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2022-12-31 |
| Reporting, Assessment Forms (RTCR)Revised Total Coliform Rule | Reporting | 2021-12-01 | Resolvedreturned 2021-12-31 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Monitoring & reporting | 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2021-12-31 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)TTHM | Monitoring & reporting | 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2021-12-31 |
| Monitoring, RegularNitrate | Monitoring & reporting | 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2021-12-31 |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL
Well below the 15 ppb action level. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2025-01-01 to 2025-12-01), 90% of the homes PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL sampled had lead at or below 1 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-01 | 1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-01 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2019-01-01 → 2019-12-01 | 1.5 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-01 | 4.4 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2013-01-01 → 2013-12-01 | 1.2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2010-01-01 → 2010-12-01 | 3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2007-01-01 → 2007-12-01 | 1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2004-01-01 → 2004-12-01 | 1.2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2001-01-01 → 2001-12-31 | 9.8 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 1998-01-01 → 1998-12-31 | 2.3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 1995-01-01 → 1995-12-31 | 14 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
| 1994-01-01 → 1994-12-31 | 5.8 ppb | Below the action level, but detectable |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2024-06-04 to 2024-12-06 · 116 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
No PFAS detected. None of the 116 UCMR5 PFAS results for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL were at or above the method reporting limit. Reporting limits are about 3–5 ppt, so “not detected” means below that threshold — not proven zero.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0 / 4 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 0 / 4 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 0 / 4 | < 3 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 4 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 4 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 0 / 4 | < 3 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
What PFAS are and how to remove them →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Every scored contaminant stayed within its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and averaged below 80% of the limit. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 42 detects | 0.675 µg/L | 1.6 µg/L | 10 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Nitrate (as N) | 1815 detects | 0.057 mg/L | 0.14 mg/L | 10 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Fluoride | 8 | 0.623 mg/L | 0.77 mg/L | 4 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Chromium (total) | 40 detects | 0 µg/L | ND | 100 µg/LMCL | Not detected |
| Uranium (combined) | 2 | 0.109 µg/L | 0.122 µg/L | 30 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 7670 detects | 3.104 µg/L | 40.4 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 7671 detects | 2.126 µg/L | 16 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Lead (tap samples) | 40 detects | 0 µg/L | ND | 15 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
| Copper (tap samples) | 4 | 4.475 µg/L | 5.5 µg/L | 1300 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL · 29,260 service lines inventoried · Q2 2026 snapshot
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL reports no lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement service lines and has classified 100% of its 29,260 lines as non-lead. Lead can still come from pre-1986 plumbing and fixtures inside a home.
Source: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory (Q2 2026) · PWS ID FL4061121 · See all Florida lead service lines. We may earn a commission from filters and test kits, at no extra cost to you.
Groundwater systems draw from wells; naturally occurring arsenic, nitrate, radium and uranium are the readings to watch, along with PFAS near industrial or military sites.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Plantation homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Plantation faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Plantation households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
What Plantation residents measured at their own tap (ZIPs 33317, 33322, 33324, 33388). All reader results →
Reader submissions are unverified and shown separately from EPA data. They reflect one tap on one day, not the utility's compliance record.
No reader results for Plantation yet - yours would be the first. A hardness or TDS number from a $10 strip kit is enough to start the map.
Help build the first reader-sourced water map. Enter whatever your test strip, TDS pen or lab report shows - one number is enough.
Plantation ranks #25 of 87 graded Florida cities.
Yes — by EPA's records Plantation, FL tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on no health-based EPA violations in the last five years and lead at 1 ppb (90th percentile, 2025) against the 15 ppb action level. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-01-01 to 2025-12-01) was 1 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 116 UCMR5 PFAS results for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL (2024-06-04 to 2024-12-06) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL has 23 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 19 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL reports groundwater as its primary source and serves about 85,496 people (EPA PWSID FL4061121).
Not on the strength of EPA's data for PLANTATION, EAST ; CENTRAL. A filter still helps with taste and with lead from your own plumbing, which no city-level test can measure.
Even with good water quality, a filter removes trace contaminants and improves taste.
For Everyday Peace of Mind
Brita Elite Pitcher
Your water already tests well — a simple carbon filter improves taste and catches trace contaminants.
Check Price on AmazonNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Find the right filter for your Plantation water quality needs:
Tap water is one piece of the picture — our sister sites cover the rest for Plantation, FL.
Predicted indoor radon by ZIP vs. the EPA 4 pCi/L action level.
Arsenic and nitrate risk for homes on a well instead of city water.
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.