Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for PARKER WSD • Updated September 2026
Grade C — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
PARKER WSD has a mixed record — read the reasons below; the deductions come from real EPA violations, lead results or PFAS detections, not from a template.
Parker, CO tap water is legal to drink but grades C on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling. A certified filter matched to that finding is a reasonable precaution.
Parker, CO tap water is legal to drink but grades C on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling. A certified filter matched to that finding is a reasonable precaution.
PARKER WSD's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31) was 2 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes. EPA's UCMR5 sampling (2024-04-01 to 2025-07-01) detected PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFOA, PFPeA, with PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt federal MCL. Reverse osmosis and certified activated-carbon filters reduce PFAS.
PARKER WSD has 7 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 5 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
PARKER WSD reports surface water as its primary source and serves about 75,949 people (EPA PWSID CO0118040).
We recommend one. Reverse osmosis or a PFAS-certified carbon filter addresses the PFAS result.
Compare filter options for your Parker tap water
PFOA or PFOS was measured at or above EPA's 4 ppt limit in Parker's UCMR5 sampling.
Unsure which contaminants to treat? Compare home kits and certified lab testing before buying.
Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
PARKER WSD · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-09-13
EPA records no health-based violations for this system in the last five years. The 5 violations on file in that window are monitoring or reporting paperwork issues, not measured contaminant exceedances.
| Violation | Category | Compliance period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notification, Known or Potential LSLLEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS | Reporting | 2025-07-02 | Resolvedreturned 2025-11-26 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Chlorite | Monitoring & reporting | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 | Resolvedreturned 2024-07-31 |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Chlorine dioxide | Monitoring & reporting | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Source Water (LT2)E. COLI | Monitoring & reporting | 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29 | Resolvedreturned 2024-02-29 |
| Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)Surface Water Treatment Rule | Monitoring & reporting | 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30 | Resolvedreturned 2023-09-30 |
| Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to ReportConsumer Confidence Rule | Other | 2022-07-01 | Resolvedreturned 2022-08-12 |
| Water Quality Parameter M/RLead and Copper Rule | Monitoring & reporting | 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 | Resolvedreturned 2021-12-31 |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by PARKER WSD
Well below the 15 ppb action level. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31), 90% of the homes PARKER WSD sampled had lead at or below 2 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31 | 2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30 | 1.8 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2024-07-01 → 2024-12-31 | 2.5 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 | 2.1 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2023-07-01 → 2023-12-31 | 1.5 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2023-01-01 → 2023-06-30 | 3.3 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2022-07-01 → 2022-12-31 | 2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2022-01-01 → 2022-06-30 | 3.9 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 | 3.7 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2021-01-01 → 2021-06-30 | 3.4 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2020-07-01 → 2020-12-31 | 4 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2020-01-01 → 2020-06-30 | 3.6 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
Copper 90th percentile: 1.4 mg/L (1992-07-01 → 1992-12-31); action level 1.3 mg/L.
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2024-04-01 to 2025-07-01 · 754 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
PFOA measured at or above EPA's legal limit in at least one sample. Utilities have until 2029 (2031 under EPA's proposed extension) to comply with the 2024 PFAS rule, so a result above the MCL today is not yet a violation — but it is the number that matters for your health.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 2 / 26 | 4.8 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 0 / 26 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 0 / 26 | < 3 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 26 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 26 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 5 / 26 | 4.6 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFBA | 5 / 26 | 8.6 | 5 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFHxA | 8 / 26 | 11.9 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
| PFPeA | 8 / 26 | 14 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
Lithium (also monitored under UCMR5, not a PFAS): detected in 26 of 26 samples, max 27.6 µg/L. There is no federal limit for lithium.
What PFAS are and how to remove them → · Best filters for PFAS →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for PARKER WSD · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples PARKER WSD reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Every scored contaminant stayed within its Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and averaged below 80% of the limit. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 484 detects | 0.131 µg/L | 2 µg/L | 10 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Nitrate (as N) | 13465 detects | 0.106 mg/L | 0.895 mg/L | 10 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Fluoride | 5149 detects | 0.966 mg/L | 1.9 mg/L | 4 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Chromium (total) | 481 detects | 0.054 µg/L | 2.6 µg/L | 100 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Uranium (combined) | 2010 detects | 1.035 µg/L | 9.4 µg/L | 30 µg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Radium-226/228 | 28 | 2.363 pCi/L | 4.8 pCi/L | 5 pCi/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Gross alpha | 2018 detects | 2.405 pCi/L | 6 pCi/L | 15 pCi/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 159153 detects | 13.923 µg/L | 52.2 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 15696 detects | 2.936 µg/L | 17.4 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
A point-of-use (under-sink) system typically runs $200-$600 installed; whole-house treatment $1,000-$3,000+ depending on flow and what has to come out. Tell us where you are and a certified water-treatment installer serving Parker will follow up - no obligation.
PARKER WSD · 20,005 service lines inventoried · Q2 2026 snapshot
PARKER WSD reports no lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement service lines and has classified 100% of its 20,005 lines as non-lead. Lead can still come from pre-1986 plumbing and fixtures inside a home.
Source: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory (Q2 2026) · PWS ID CO0118040 · See all Colorado lead service lines. We may earn a commission from filters and test kits, at no extra cost to you.
Surface-water systems draw from rivers, lakes or reservoirs and must filter and disinfect, which is why disinfection byproducts (TTHM, HAA5) are the readings to watch.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Parker homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Parker faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Parker households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
What Parker residents measured at their own tap (ZIPs 80134, 80138). All reader results →
Reader submissions are unverified and shown separately from EPA data. They reflect one tap on one day, not the utility's compliance record.
No reader results for Parker yet - yours would be the first. A hardness or TDS number from a $10 strip kit is enough to start the map.
Help build the first reader-sourced water map. Enter whatever your test strip, TDS pen or lab report shows - one number is enough.
Parker ranks #32 of 35 graded Colorado cities.
Deep-dive guides for the specific contaminants EPA data flagged in Parker's water, with removal options for each.
Parker, CO tap water is legal to drink but grades C on EPA's records, mainly because of PFOA or PFOS measured at or above the 4 ppt federal limit in 2023–2025 EPA sampling. A certified filter matched to that finding is a reasonable precaution.
PARKER WSD's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31) was 2 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes. EPA's UCMR5 sampling (2024-04-01 to 2025-07-01) detected PFBA, PFBS, PFHxA, PFOA, PFPeA, with PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt federal MCL. Reverse osmosis and certified activated-carbon filters reduce PFAS.
PARKER WSD has 7 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 5 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
PARKER WSD reports surface water as its primary source and serves about 75,949 people (EPA PWSID CO0118040).
We recommend one. Reverse osmosis or a PFAS-certified carbon filter addresses the PFAS result.
PFOA or PFOS was measured at or above EPA's 4 ppt limit in Parker's UCMR5 sampling.
Most Popular for PFAS
Waterdrop 3-Stage Under-Sink
Lab-tested against PFAS "forever chemicals" — installs under the sink in minutes and costs far less than RO.
Check Price on AmazonCompare direct from Waterdrop
Reverse osmosis systems for PFAS
Reverse osmosis is the most thorough filtration class against PFAS — browse Waterdrop RO systems and check each model’s own tested claims.
Shop Reverse Osmosis Systems →Whole-Home Filtration System
Whole-house system — treats every tap at the source
For consistently poor water, a whole-home system filters every faucet, shower, and appliance — the permanent, install-once fix that goes beyond a single point-of-use filter.
Explore Whole-Home SystemsNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Based on contaminants detected in your water, these resources may be helpful:
Find the right filter for your Parker water quality needs:
Tap water is one piece of the picture — our sister sites cover the rest for Parker, CO.
Predicted indoor radon by ZIP vs. the EPA 4 pCi/L action level.
Arsenic and nitrate risk for homes on a well instead of city water.
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.