35 cities ranked best to worst by EPA-record water quality score
Pueblo has the best tap water grade in Colorado (A, 100/100); Brighton is lowest (D, 64/100). 2 of the 35 graded systems have a health-based EPA violation in the last five years; 89% earn a B or better, so safety depends on your utility.
This page ranks the 35 Colorado cities whose water systems we have matched to EPA records. Every city starts at 100 points and loses points for health-based EPA violations in the last five years (SDWIS 2026Q2), its most recent Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile result, PFAS detected in EPA's 2023–2026 UCMR5 monitoring, and 2012–2019 compliance samples that averaged near or above a limit. Letters follow fixed bands (A ≥90, B ≥80, C ≥70, D ≥60, F below 60). Cities run from the highest score (Pueblo) down to the lowest (Brighton); ties are ordered by population served. See the full scoring methodology for every deduction and the data vintages.
An A or B grade points to water that consistently tests within federal safety limits, while a C suggests moderate issues worth watching and a D or F flags contaminants or compliance problems serious enough to act on. These grades describe system-level water leaving the treatment plant — they can't account for your home's own plumbing, so older houses with lead service lines or fixtures can add contaminants after the water arrives. For a contaminant-by-contaminant view, see the Colorado contaminant breakdown or drill into the county-level rankings.
What the EPA service line inventory and our Colorado guide say, beyond the scores.
We track 35 cities in Colorado. 35 of them are matched to an active EPA-registered community water system (PWSID). Those 35 systems report serving 4,742,845 people in EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS).
Of all 35 cities Colorado cities we can grade from EPA records, 31 cities (89%) grade B or better, 2 sit in the C range and 2 grade D or F. The average score is 94/100.
EPA records 2 health-based violations in the last five years across 2 cities. Monitoring and reporting violations (93 in the same window) are paperwork lapses and cost far fewer points.
31 cities have a Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile result from 2020 or later: 4 cities at 5 ppb or more.
EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023–2026) covers 32 cities: PFAS were detected in 9 cities, and PFOA or PFOS reached EPA's 4 ppt limit in 4 cities.
Centennial scores highest (100) and Brighton lowest (64), a 36-point spread.
Lead pipes are the part of tap-water risk a treatment-plant grade cannot see, so start with EPA's service line inventory (Q2 2026 snapshot). 1,234 Colorado systems inventoried 1,826,911 service lines: 18,792 confirmed lead plus 2,620 galvanized lines requiring replacement, spread across 21 systems. Only 141,309 lines (7.7%) remain unverified, so Colorado's inventory is comparatively complete.
Of the 32 city-linked Colorado utilities with an inventory on file, 13 report at least one lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement line, 1 reports none but still has a quarter or more of its lines unverified, and 18 report no lead with most lines verified. DENVER WATER BOARD, which serves Denver and 1,287,000 people, is the biggest and reports 15,826 lead lines and 848 galvanized requiring replacement.
Colorado's guide on this site singles out uranium and radium, selenium, nitrates, and disinfection byproducts. Uranium (EPA MCL 30 µg/L) increases cancer risk and is toxic to the kidneys; Selenium (EPA MCL 0.05 mg/L) can cause hair and fingernail loss, numbness and circulatory problems; Nitrate (EPA MCL 10 mg/L (as nitrogen)) can cause methemoglobinemia ("blue baby syndrome") in infants under six months; Disinfection byproducts (regulated as TTHM (80 ppb) and HAA5 (60 ppb)) are associated with increased cancer risk over long exposure.
Where a system draws its water shapes which of these show up. Disinfection byproducts are a surface-water signature: chlorine reacts with organic matter in rivers and reservoirs, so byproducts tend to run higher where systems chlorinate surface water. Uranium and selenium are naturally occurring and tend to show up in groundwater, leaching from bedrock into aquifers rather than arriving from pollution. Nitrate follows fertilizer, manure and septic loading, so it is most often a concern for systems drawing shallow groundwater in farm regions. Lead is different again: it enters after treatment from service lines and household plumbing, which is why the inventory figures above matter more than plant-level results. Your utility's Consumer Confidence Report names your source.
| Contaminant | Federal limit | Cities elevated | Over limit | Highest reading | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Trihalomethanes | EPA MCL 0.080 mg/L (80 ppb) | 11 | 0 | Lafayette | Total Trihalomethanes is associated with liver, kidney and nervous-system effects and increased cancer risk over long exposure. |
| Haloacetic Acids | EPA MCL 0.060 mg/L (60 ppb) for HAA5 | 4 | 0 | Steamboat Springs | Haloacetic Acids is associated with increased cancer risk over long exposure. |
| PFAS | EPA 2024 MCLs of 4.0 ppt for PFOA and PFOS | 4 | 3 | Brighton | PFAS are linked to immune, developmental, liver and some cancer effects. |
| Radium | EPA MCL 5 pCi/L (combined radium-226/228) | 2 | 0 | Aurora | Radium increases cancer risk with long exposure. |
| Lead | EPA action level 0.015 mg/L (15 ppb); health goal 0 | 1 | 0 | Grand Junction | Lead harms brain development in children and raises blood pressure and kidney risk in adults. |
| Nitrate | EPA MCL 10 mg/L (as nitrogen) | 1 | 0 | Commerce City | Nitrate can cause methemoglobinemia ("blue baby syndrome") in infants under six months. |
| Uranium | EPA MCL 30 µg/L | 1 | 0 | Commerce City | Uranium increases cancer risk and is toxic to the kidneys. |
Service line counts: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory, Q2 2026 snapshot (updated 2026-08-18). Limits: EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
How Colorado's 35 cities are distributed by water quality grade
31 out of 35 cities meet or exceed a B grade for water quality
Sorted by water quality score from best to worst. Click any city for a detailed water quality report.
| Rank | City | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pueblo | 100/100 | A |
| 2 | Centennial | 100/100 | A |
| 3 | Vail | 100/100 | A |
| #4 | Northglenn | 100/100 | A |
| #5 | Littleton | 100/100 | A |
| #6 | Erie | 100/100 | A |
| #7 | Golden | 100/100 | A |
| #8 | Wheat Ridge | 100/100 | A |
| #9 | Montrose | 100/100 | A |
| #10 | Steamboat Springs | 100/100 | A |
| #11 | Loveland | 99/100 | A |
| #12 | Evans | 99/100 | A |
| #13 | Boulder | 98/100 | A |
| #14 | Longmont | 98/100 | A |
| #15 | Durango | 98/100 | A |
| #16 | Fort Morgan | 98/100 | A |
| #17 | Colorado Springs | 97/100 | A |
| #18 | Westminster | 97/100 | A |
| #19 | Greeley | 97/100 | A |
| #20 | Grand Junction | 97/100 | A |
| #21 | Windsor | 97/100 | A |
| #22 | Arvada | 96/100 | A |
| #23 | Lafayette | 95/100 | A |
| #24 | Aurora | 94/100 | A |
| #25 | Fort Collins | 94/100 | A |
| #26 | Lakewood | 94/100 | A |
| #27 | Commerce City | 94/100 | A |
| #28 | Fountain | 91/100 | A |
| #29 | Denver | 90/100 | A |
| #30 | Broomfield | 89/100 | B |
| #31 | Castle Rock | 88/100 | B |
| #32 | Parker | 79/100 | C |
| #33 | Englewood | 77/100 | C |
| #34 | Thornton | 67/100 | D |
| #35 | Brighton | 64/100 | D |
Sources: EPA SDWIS/ECHO violations and Lead and Copper Rule results (2026Q2 extract), UCMR5 PFAS occurrence (2023–2026), SYR4 compliance samples (2012–2019). Rubric v2 — methodology.
Found your city above? These guides turn its grade into an action plan.
Pitcher vs. under-sink vs. reverse osmosis, matched to the contaminants reported in Colorado systems.
Farm-runoff contamination, infant risk, and treatment options
Best filters for nitrates →Taste, odor, trihalomethanes, and why a carbon filter handles them
EPA's inventory of lead pipes by water system — a risk these plant-level grades cannot capture.
Put a Colorado city next to where you're moving from (or to) and see every contaminant head to head.
The best water quality in Colorado is found in Pueblo with a score of 100/100 and a grade of A. This puts Pueblo among the top-performing cities in the country for drinking water safety.
The most concerning water quality is in Brighton scoring 64/100 with a grade of D. Residents may want to consider home water testing and filtration options.
The statewide average score is 94/100, which is 6 points above the national average of 88/100. A strong majority (86%) of Colorado cities exceed the national average, indicating generally good water infrastructure across the state.
2 Colorado cities have a D or F grade. Residents in those areas — and anyone wanting extra protection — should consider a certified water filter that removes the specific contaminants found in Colorado water systems.
Best for Multi-Contaminant Removal
APEC Reverse Osmosis System
Removes lead, PFAS, arsenic, nitrates, fluoride & 99%+ of contaminants. NSF certified.
Check Price on AmazonBest Pitcher Filter (Renter-Friendly)
ZeroWater 10-Cup Filter Pitcher
NSF 53 certified to reduce lead and chromium. No installation — fill from the tap and pour.
Check Price on AmazonWe may earn a commission when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Pueblo has the best water quality grade among the 35 Colorado cities we can grade, with a score of 100/100 (grade A). Scores start at 100 and lose points for health-based EPA violations, lead 90th-percentile results, PFAS detections in EPA's UCMR5 monitoring and historical (2012–2019) readings near a limit. 10 cities share this top score; the largest system is listed first.
It varies by utility. Across the 35 Colorado cities we grade from EPA records, the average score is 94/100 and 89% earn a B or better. 2 cities have at least one health-based EPA violation in the last five years. 2 cities grade D or F; residents there should consider a certified filter matched to the finding on the city page. Lead from household plumbing is not captured by any city-level grade.
By population served: Denver grades A (90/100, #29 of 35); Aurora grades A (94/100, #24 of 35); Colorado Springs grades A (97/100, #17 of 35); Thornton grades D (67/100, #34 of 35); Westminster grades A (97/100, #18 of 35). Each city report lists the utility's violations, lead 90th-percentile result and PFAS results.
Of the 35 graded Colorado cities, 2 cities have a D or F grade. Another 2 cities fall in the C range. 30 of 35 (86%) score above the national average of 88/100 across all graded U.S. cities in our dataset.
This page ranks 35 Colorado cities from EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (violations and lead results, 2026Q2), UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023–2026) and Six-Year Review sample data (2012–2019). Each city link opens a report with the utility's violation history, lead 90th-percentile results and PFAS table. For official Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR), contact your local water utility — federal law requires all community water systems to deliver an annual CCR to customers. The Colorado state environmental agency and the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) also publish official water quality data.
State water quality summary and key statistics
Top 20 cities with the cleanest water
Top-ranked cities nationwide
Cities with the most concerning water
Compare water quality across all 50 states
Side-by-side water quality comparison
Which contaminants show up in Colorado water
Certified filters matched to your contaminants