Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
EPA records for TULSA • Updated September 2026
Grade A — based on EPA compliance records, lead testing and PFAS monitoring
TULSA has a clean recent record: no health-based violations in the last five years and no lead, PFAS or historical monitoring result that costs it more than a few points.
Yes — by EPA's records Tulsa, OK tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on no health-based EPA violations in the last five years and lead at 1.2 ppb (90th percentile, 2025) against the 15 ppb action level. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
Yes — by EPA's records Tulsa, OK tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on no health-based EPA violations in the last five years and lead at 1.2 ppb (90th percentile, 2025) against the 15 ppb action level. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
TULSA's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31) was 1.2 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 232 UCMR5 PFAS results for TULSA (2023-01-09 to 2023-10-03) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
TULSA has 23 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 0 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
TULSA reports surface water as its primary source and serves about 413,000 people (EPA PWSID OK1020418).
Not on the strength of EPA's data for TULSA. A filter still helps with taste and with lead from your own plumbing, which no city-level test can measure.
Want to know what's really in your Tulsa tap water?
EPA data describes water leaving the plant — a certified mail-in lab test shows what reaches your own faucet, including lead from household plumbing.
Tap Score certified lab · Amazon. We may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
TULSA · SDWIS records since 2016 · 5-year window starts 2021-09-13
EPA records no health-based violations for this system in the last five years.
| Violation | Category | Compliance period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)CARBON, TOTAL | Monitoring & reporting | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 | Archived |
| Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)CARBON, TOTAL | Monitoring & reporting | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regular1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regularp-Dichlorobenzene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularDICHLOROMETHANE | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularCarbon tetrachloride | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regular1,1,1-Trichloroethane | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularTrichloroethylene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularXylenes, Total | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularCHLOROBENZENE | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularVinyl chloride | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regular1,1-Dichloroethylene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularStyrene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regular1,1,2-Trichloroethane | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularBenzene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularEthylbenzene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regularcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regular1,2-Dichloroethane | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regulartrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regularo-Dichlorobenzene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularToluene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, Regular1,2-Dichloropropane | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
| Monitoring, RegularTetrachloroethylene | Monitoring & reporting | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | Archived |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_VIOLATIONS_ENFORCEMENT.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile results reported by TULSA
Well below the 15 ppb action level. In the most recent monitoring period on file (2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31), 90% of the homes TULSA sampled had lead at or below 1.2 ppb.
EPA's action level is 15 ppb (dropping to 10 ppb under the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements). There is no safe level of lead; the 90th-percentile figure describes the system, not your tap — homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing can be higher.
| Monitoring period | Lead 90th percentile | vs 15 ppb action level |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 | 1.2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 | 1.67 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 | 1.06 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 | 1.14 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2021-01-01 → 2021-06-30 | 0.82 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 | 3.4 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2019-01-01 → 2019-12-31 | 1.27 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31 | 1.66 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2014-01-01 → 2016-12-31 | 2.2 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2011-01-01 → 2013-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
| 2013-07-01 → 2013-12-31 | 0 ppb | Well below the 15 ppb action level |
Source: ECHO SDWA bulk download (SDWA_LCR_SAMPLES.csv, SDWIS 2026Q2, file dated 2026-07-09, fetched 2026-09-13)
EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 2023-01-09 to 2023-10-03 · 232 PFAS results at entry points to the distribution system
No PFAS detected. None of the 232 UCMR5 PFAS results for TULSA were at or above the method reporting limit. Reporting limits are about 3–5 ppt, so “not detected” means below that threshold — not proven zero.
| Compound | Detects / samples | Max (ppt) | Reporting limit | EPA MCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFOS | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS | 0 / 8 | < 3 | 3 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 0 / 8 | < 4 | 4 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA | 0 / 8 | < 5 | 5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBS | 0 / 8 | < 3 | 3 ppt | hazard index only |
“< 4 ppt” means below the laboratory reporting limit, not zero. ppt = parts per trillion (ng/L). Results are for finished water leaving the treatment plant.
What PFAS are and how to remove them →
Source: UCMR5 occurrence data, EPA Data Summary July 2026 (UCMR5_All.txt)
EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance samples for TULSA · finished water only · dated data, released 2024
These are the regulated-contaminant samples TULSA reported to its state between 2012 and 2019 — the most recent nationwide sample-level dataset EPA has published. Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) is flagged below; the status column explains why. Treat this as history, not today's tap water.
| Contaminant | Samples | Average | Max | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 20 detects | 0 µg/L | ND | 10 µg/LMCL | Not detected |
| Fluoride | 196 | 0.654 mg/L | 0.92 mg/L | 4 mg/LMCL | Within MCL |
| Chromium (total) | 20 detects | 0 µg/L | ND | 100 µg/LMCL | Not detected |
| Uranium (combined) | 20 detects | 0 µg/L | ND | 30 µg/LMCL | Not detected |
| Radium-226/228 | 20 detects | 0 pCi/L | ND | 5 pCi/LMCL | Not detected |
| Gross alpha | 20 detects | 0 pCi/L | ND | 15 pCi/LMCL | Not detected |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) | 256 | 35.62 µg/L | 106 µg/L | 80 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | 3 single samples over MCL; average within limit |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 256255 detects | 15.453 µg/L | 45.8 µg/L | 60 µg/LMCL (LRAA) | Within MCL |
| Lead (tap samples) | 425106 detects | 0.472 µg/L | 10.3 µg/L | 15 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
| Copper (tap samples) | 428427 detects | 157.899 µg/L | 717 µg/L | 1300 µg/Laction level (90th percentile) | Reported, not scored (compliance is on the 90th percentile) |
Averages count non-detects as zero. TTHM and HAA5 limits are locational running annual averages, so a single high sample is not a violation — we grade those on the average only. Lead and copper rows are individual tap samples and are shown for context; compliance (and our score) uses the 90th-percentile result above. LRAA = locational running annual average; ND = not detected.
Source: SYR4 Six-Year Review compliance monitoring data 2012–2019 (released 2024-03)
TULSA · 162,343 service lines inventoried · Q2 2026 snapshot
TULSA reports no confirmed lead service lines, but 128,216 lines (79%) have not yet been verified, so lead cannot be ruled out for those homes. Utilities must keep investigating unknown lines under EPA's Lead and Copper Rule Improvements.
Source: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory (Q2 2026) · PWS ID OK1020418 · See all Oklahoma lead service lines. We may earn a commission from filters and test kits, at no extra cost to you.
Surface-water systems draw from rivers, lakes or reservoirs and must filter and disinfect, which is why disinfection byproducts (TTHM, HAA5) are the readings to watch.
How to test your tap water and the treatment options that actually fit Tulsa homes
The most reliable way to know what is actually coming out of your tap is a certified mail-in lab test. City-wide EPA data (like the report above) reflects the water leaving the treatment plant, but contaminants such as lead and copper can be picked up from your own service line and household plumbing — so the water at your Tulsa faucet can differ from the system average. A state-certified lab measures dozens of contaminants at once with results you can trust; you can also find one near you through the EPA's certified-lab list at epa.gov/dwlabcert. Hardware-store test strips are cheaper and instant, but they only screen for a few basics (chlorine, hardness, pH, and a rough lead pass/fail) and are far less accurate — treat them as a first look, not a diagnosis.
Match the treatment to what your test finds. Reverse osmosis (RO) removes the widest range of contaminants — lead, arsenic, nitrate, PFAS, and dissolved solids — which makes an under-sink reverse osmosis system the most thorough choice for Tulsa households with heavy-metal or PFAS concerns. If your main issue is taste, odor, or chlorine, an activated carbon filter (pitcher, faucet, or under-sink) is simpler and cheaper and handles chlorine and many organic compounds well, though carbon alone does not remove arsenic, nitrate, or most PFAS. NSF-certified pitchers rated for lead reduction are the easiest way to start today while you decide on a permanent setup.
We may earn a commission from testing kits and filters purchased through these links, at no extra cost to you.
What Tulsa residents measured at their own tap (ZIPs 74015, 74103, 74104, 74105 +25 more). All reader results →
Reader submissions are unverified and shown separately from EPA data. They reflect one tap on one day, not the utility's compliance record.
No reader results for Tulsa yet - yours would be the first. A hardness or TDS number from a $10 strip kit is enough to start the map.
Help build the first reader-sourced water map. Enter whatever your test strip, TDS pen or lab report shows - one number is enough.
Tulsa ranks #1 of 2 graded Oklahoma cities.
Yes — by EPA's records Tulsa, OK tap water is safe to drink and earns an A. The grade rests on no health-based EPA violations in the last five years and lead at 1.2 ppb (90th percentile, 2025) against the 15 ppb action level. Lead from your own service line or plumbing is the main risk city-level data cannot see, so homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
TULSA's most recent Lead and Copper Rule result (2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31) was 1.2 ppb at the 90th percentile, below EPA's 15 ppb action level. Because lead usually comes from service lines and household plumbing, homes built before 1986 should still test at the tap.
No. None of the 232 UCMR5 PFAS results for TULSA (2023-01-09 to 2023-10-03) were at or above the reporting limit of roughly 3–5 ppt.
TULSA has 23 violations on file since 2016: 0 health-based in the last five years and 0 monitoring or reporting violations in that window. Monitoring violations are paperwork lapses, not measured contamination.
TULSA reports surface water as its primary source and serves about 413,000 people (EPA PWSID OK1020418).
Not on the strength of EPA's data for TULSA. A filter still helps with taste and with lead from your own plumbing, which no city-level test can measure.
Even with good water quality, a filter removes trace contaminants and improves taste.
For Everyday Peace of Mind
Brita Elite Pitcher
Your water already tests well — a simple carbon filter improves taste and catches trace contaminants.
Check Price on AmazonNot sure what filter you need?
Test your tap water first, so you filter for what's actually in it.
Shop Home Water Test Kits →We may earn a commission from Amazon and Waterdrop when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Find the right filter for your Tulsa water quality needs:
Tap water is one piece of the picture — our sister sites cover the rest for Tulsa, OK.
Live EPA AirNow AQI, dominant pollutant and forecast.
Predicted indoor radon by ZIP vs. the EPA 4 pCi/L action level.
Understand your water better with our in-depth guides on contaminants, filtration, and water safety.