20 cities ranked best to worst by EPA-record water quality score
Wichita has the best tap water grade in Kansas (A, 100/100); Junction City is lowest (F, 55/100). 4 of the 20 graded systems have a health-based EPA violation in the last five years; 85% earn a B or better, so safety depends on your utility.
This page ranks the 20 Kansas cities whose water systems we have matched to EPA records. Every city starts at 100 points and loses points for health-based EPA violations in the last five years (SDWIS 2026Q2), its most recent Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile result, PFAS detected in EPA's 2023–2026 UCMR5 monitoring, and 2012–2019 compliance samples that averaged near or above a limit. Letters follow fixed bands (A ≥90, B ≥80, C ≥70, D ≥60, F below 60). Cities run from the highest score (Wichita) down to the lowest (Junction City); ties are ordered by population served. See the full scoring methodology for every deduction and the data vintages. 5 further Kansas cities are listed at the bottom without a grade because we have not yet matched them to an EPA water system.
An A or B grade points to water that consistently tests within federal safety limits, while a C suggests moderate issues worth watching and a D or F flags contaminants or compliance problems serious enough to act on. These grades describe system-level water leaving the treatment plant — they can't account for your home's own plumbing, so older houses with lead service lines or fixtures can add contaminants after the water arrives. For a contaminant-by-contaminant view, see the Kansas contaminant breakdown or drill into the county-level rankings.
What the EPA service line inventory and our Kansas guide say, beyond the scores.
This ranking covers 25 Kansas cities. 20 of them are matched to an active EPA-registered community water system (PWSID). Those 20 systems report serving 1,341,797 people in EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS).
Of 20 cities of the 25 Kansas cities we can grade from EPA records, 17 cities (85%) grade B or better, 2 sit in the C range and 1 grade D or F. The average score is 90/100. 5 cities are not graded because they have not been matched to an EPA system yet.
EPA records 9 health-based violations in the last five years across 4 cities. Monitoring and reporting violations (14 in the same window) are paperwork lapses and cost far fewer points.
20 cities have a Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile result from 2020 or later: 2 cities at 5 ppb or more.
EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023–2026) covers 20 cities: PFAS were detected in 7 cities, and PFOA or PFOS reached EPA's 4 ppt limit in 2 cities.
Leavenworth scores highest (100) and Junction City lowest (55), a 45-point spread.
The clearest hard data for Kansas is EPA's service line inventory, updated 2026-08-18 (Q2 2026). 887 Kansas systems inventoried 945,460 service lines: 17,053 confirmed lead plus 60,231 galvanized lines requiring replacement, spread across 145 systems. Another 199,194 lines (21%) are still of unknown material, which EPA counts as possible lead until verified.
Of the 16 city-linked Kansas utilities with an inventory on file, 15 report at least one lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement line and 1 reports no lead with most lines verified. WICHITA, CITY OF, which serves Wichita and 395,699 people, is the biggest and reports 16 lead lines and 6,015 galvanized requiring replacement. The most lead lines among city-linked systems belong to PITTSBURG, CITY OF (Pittsburg): 1,709.
Our Kansas water guide flags nitrates, selenium and naturally occurring minerals, atrazine and herbicides, and disinfection byproducts as the contaminants of regional concern. Nitrate (EPA MCL 10 mg/L (as nitrogen)) can cause methemoglobinemia ("blue baby syndrome") in infants under six months; Selenium (EPA MCL 0.05 mg/L) can cause hair and fingernail loss, numbness and circulatory problems; Atrazine (EPA MCL 0.003 mg/L) is associated with cardiovascular and reproductive effects; Disinfection byproducts (regulated as TTHM (80 ppb) and HAA5 (60 ppb)) are associated with increased cancer risk over long exposure.
Source water explains a lot of the pattern in Kansas. Disinfection byproducts are a surface-water signature: chlorine reacts with organic matter in rivers and reservoirs, so byproducts tend to run higher where systems chlorinate surface water. Selenium and uranium are naturally occurring and tend to show up in groundwater, leaching from bedrock into aquifers rather than arriving from pollution. Nitrate and atrazine follow fertilizer, manure and septic loading, so they are most often a concern for systems drawing shallow groundwater in farm regions. Lead is different again: it enters after treatment from service lines and household plumbing, which is why the inventory figures above matter more than plant-level results. Your utility's Consumer Confidence Report names your source.
| Contaminant | Federal limit | Cities elevated | Over limit | Highest reading | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Trihalomethanes | EPA MCL 0.080 mg/L (80 ppb) | 6 | 0 | Junction City | Total Trihalomethanes is associated with liver, kidney and nervous-system effects and increased cancer risk over long exposure. |
| Haloacetic Acids | EPA MCL 0.060 mg/L (60 ppb) for HAA5 | 2 | 0 | Topeka | Haloacetic Acids is associated with increased cancer risk over long exposure. |
| PFAS | EPA 2024 MCLs of 4.0 ppt for PFOA and PFOS | 2 | 2 | Great Bend | PFAS are linked to immune, developmental, liver and some cancer effects. |
| Arsenic | EPA MCL 0.010 mg/L (10 ppb) | 1 | 0 | Newton | Arsenic is linked to skin damage, circulatory problems and increased cancer risk. |
| Lead | EPA action level 0.015 mg/L (15 ppb); health goal 0 | 1 | 0 | Olathe | Lead harms brain development in children and raises blood pressure and kidney risk in adults. |
| Radium | EPA MCL 5 pCi/L (combined radium-226/228) | 1 | 0 | Garden City | Radium increases cancer risk with long exposure. |
Service line counts: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory, Q2 2026 snapshot (updated 2026-08-18). Limits: EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
How Kansas's 20 cities are distributed by water quality grade
17 out of 20 cities meet or exceed a B grade for water quality
Sorted by water quality score from best to worst. Click any city for a detailed water quality report.
| Rank | City | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wichita | 100/100 | A |
| 2 | Manhattan | 100/100 | A |
| 3 | Leavenworth | 100/100 | A |
| #4 | Newton | 100/100 | A |
| #5 | Pittsburg | 99/100 | A |
| #6 | Liberal | 99/100 | A |
| #7 | Derby | 98/100 | A |
| #8 | Gardner | 98/100 | A |
| #9 | Lawrence | 96/100 | A |
| #10 | Kansas City | 95/100 | A |
| #11 | Topeka | 94/100 | A |
| #12 | Salina | 94/100 | A |
| #13 | Hays | 94/100 | A |
| #14 | Olathe | 89/100 | B |
| #15 | Hutchinson | 89/100 | B |
| #16 | Garden City | 80/100 | B |
| #17 | Emporia | 80/100 | B |
| #18 | Dodge City | 75/100 | C |
| #19 | Great Bend | 74/100 | C |
| #20 | Junction City | 55/100 | F |
Sources: EPA SDWIS/ECHO violations and Lead and Copper Rule results (2026Q2 extract), UCMR5 PFAS occurrence (2023–2026), SYR4 compliance samples (2012–2019). Rubric v2 — methodology.
Found your city above? These guides turn its grade into an action plan.
Pitcher vs. under-sink vs. reverse osmosis, matched to the contaminants reported in Kansas systems.
Farm-runoff contamination, infant risk, and treatment options
Best filters for nitrates →Atrazine and other agricultural chemicals, and how to filter them
EPA's inventory of lead pipes by water system — a risk these plant-level grades cannot capture.
Put a Kansas city next to where you're moving from (or to) and see every contaminant head to head.
The best water quality in Kansas is found in Wichita with a score of 100/100 and a grade of A. This puts Wichita among the top-performing cities in the country for drinking water safety.
The most concerning water quality is in Junction City scoring 55/100 with a grade of F. Residents may want to consider home water testing and filtration options.
1 city with D or F grades:
The statewide average score is 90/100, which is 2 points above the national average of 88/100. A strong majority (75%) of Kansas cities exceed the national average, indicating generally good water infrastructure across the state.
1 Kansas city has a D or F grade. Residents in those areas — and anyone wanting extra protection — should consider a certified water filter that removes the specific contaminants found in Kansas water systems.
Best for Multi-Contaminant Removal
APEC Reverse Osmosis System
Removes lead, PFAS, arsenic, nitrates, fluoride & 99%+ of contaminants. NSF certified.
Check Price on AmazonBest Pitcher Filter (Renter-Friendly)
ZeroWater 10-Cup Filter Pitcher
NSF 53 certified to reduce lead and chromium. No installation — fill from the tap and pour.
Check Price on AmazonWe may earn a commission when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Wichita has the best water quality grade among the 20 Kansas cities we can grade, with a score of 100/100 (grade A). Scores start at 100 and lose points for health-based EPA violations, lead 90th-percentile results, PFAS detections in EPA's UCMR5 monitoring and historical (2012–2019) readings near a limit. 4 cities share this top score; the largest system is listed first.
It varies by utility. Across the 20 Kansas cities we grade from EPA records, the average score is 90/100 and 85% earn a B or better. 4 cities have at least one health-based EPA violation in the last five years. 1 city grades D or F; residents there should consider a certified filter matched to the finding on the city page. Lead from household plumbing is not captured by any city-level grade.
By population served: Wichita grades A (100/100, #1 of 20); Kansas City grades A (95/100, #10 of 20); Olathe grades B (89/100, #14 of 20); Topeka grades A (94/100, #11 of 20); Lawrence grades A (96/100, #9 of 20). Each city report lists the utility's violations, lead 90th-percentile result and PFAS results.
Of the 20 graded Kansas cities, 1 city has a D or F grade. Another 2 cities fall in the C range. 15 of 20 (75%) score above the national average of 88/100 across all graded U.S. cities in our dataset. 5 further Kansas cities are not graded because we have not matched them to an EPA water system yet.
This page ranks 20 Kansas cities from EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (violations and lead results, 2026Q2), UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023–2026) and Six-Year Review sample data (2012–2019). Each city link opens a report with the utility's violation history, lead 90th-percentile results and PFAS table. For official Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR), contact your local water utility — federal law requires all community water systems to deliver an annual CCR to customers. The Kansas state environmental agency and the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) also publish official water quality data.
State water quality summary and key statistics
Top 20 cities with the cleanest water
Top-ranked cities nationwide
Cities with the most concerning water
Compare water quality across all 50 states
Side-by-side water quality comparison
Which contaminants show up in Kansas water
Certified filters matched to your contaminants