24 cities ranked best to worst by EPA-record water quality score
Des Moines has the best tap water grade in Iowa (A, 100/100); Sioux City is lowest (C, 72/100). Overall, none of the 24 Iowa systems we grade has a health-based EPA violation in the last five years, so the state's tap water is safe by EPA compliance records — 92% earn a B or better.
This page ranks the 24 Iowa cities whose water systems we have matched to EPA records. Every city starts at 100 points and loses points for health-based EPA violations in the last five years (SDWIS 2026Q2), its most recent Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile result, PFAS detected in EPA's 2023–2026 UCMR5 monitoring, and 2012–2019 compliance samples that averaged near or above a limit. Letters follow fixed bands (A ≥90, B ≥80, C ≥70, D ≥60, F below 60). Cities run from the highest score (Des Moines) down to the lowest (Sioux City); ties are ordered by population served. See the full scoring methodology for every deduction and the data vintages. 1 further Iowa city is listed at the bottom without a grade because we have not yet matched it to an EPA water system.
An A or B grade points to water that consistently tests within federal safety limits, while a C suggests moderate issues worth watching and a D or F flags contaminants or compliance problems serious enough to act on. These grades describe system-level water leaving the treatment plant — they can't account for your home's own plumbing, so older houses with lead service lines or fixtures can add contaminants after the water arrives. For a contaminant-by-contaminant view, see the Iowa contaminant breakdown or drill into the county-level rankings.
What the EPA service line inventory and our Iowa guide say, beyond the scores.
We track 25 cities in Iowa. 24 of them are matched to an active EPA-registered community water system (PWSID). Those 24 systems report serving 1,470,797 people in EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS).
Of 24 cities of the 25 Iowa cities we can grade from EPA records, 22 cities (92%) grade B or better, 2 sit in the C range and 0 grade D or F. The average score is 96/100. 1 city is not graded because it has not been matched to an EPA system yet.
None of the 24 graded systems has a health-based EPA violation in the last five years; the 8 violations on file in that window are monitoring or reporting lapses.
24 cities have a Lead and Copper Rule 90th-percentile result from 2020 or later: 2 cities at 5 ppb or more.
EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023–2026) covers 24 cities: PFAS were detected in 7 cities, and PFOA or PFOS reached EPA's 4 ppt limit in 4 cities.
Ankeny scores highest (100) and Sioux City lowest (72), a 28-point spread.
Lead pipes are the part of tap-water risk a treatment-plant grade cannot see, so start with EPA's service line inventory (Q2 2026 snapshot). 1,194 Iowa systems inventoried 1,186,924 service lines: 55,535 confirmed lead plus 12,510 galvanized lines requiring replacement, spread across 294 systems. Another 180,543 lines (15%) are still of unknown material, which EPA counts as possible lead until verified.
Of the 24 city-linked Iowa utilities with an inventory on file, 17 report at least one lead or galvanized-requiring-replacement line and 7 report no lead with most lines verified. DES MOINES WATER WORKS, which serves Des Moines and 246,055 people, is the biggest and reports 8,114 lead lines and 10 galvanized requiring replacement. The most lead lines among city-linked systems belong to IOWA-AMERICAN WTR CO-DAVENPORT (Davenport): 9,620.
Iowa's guide on this site singles out nitrates, atrazine and other herbicides, bacteria, and arsenic. Nitrate (EPA MCL 10 mg/L (as nitrogen)) can cause methemoglobinemia ("blue baby syndrome") in infants under six months; Atrazine (EPA MCL 0.003 mg/L) is associated with cardiovascular and reproductive effects; Coliform bacteria (any E. coli-positive sample violates the Revised Total Coliform Rule) signal that disease-causing organisms may be present; Arsenic (EPA MCL 0.010 mg/L (10 ppb)) is linked to skin damage, circulatory problems and increased cancer risk.
Where a system draws its water shapes which of these show up. Disinfection byproducts are a surface-water signature: chlorine reacts with organic matter in rivers and reservoirs, so byproducts tend to run higher where systems chlorinate surface water. Arsenic is naturally occurring and tends to show up in groundwater, leaching from bedrock into aquifers rather than arriving from pollution. Nitrate and atrazine follow fertilizer, manure and septic loading, so they are most often a concern for systems drawing shallow groundwater in farm regions. Lead is different again: it enters after treatment from service lines and household plumbing, which is why the inventory figures above matter more than plant-level results. Your utility's Consumer Confidence Report names your source.
| Contaminant | Federal limit | Cities elevated | Over limit | Highest reading | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Trihalomethanes | EPA MCL 0.080 mg/L (80 ppb) | 8 | 0 | Burlington | Total Trihalomethanes is associated with liver, kidney and nervous-system effects and increased cancer risk over long exposure. |
| PFAS | EPA 2024 MCLs of 4.0 ppt for PFOA and PFOS | 5 | 5 | Sioux City | PFAS are linked to immune, developmental, liver and some cancer effects. |
| Lead | EPA action level 0.015 mg/L (15 ppb); health goal 0 | 1 | 0 | Marion | Lead harms brain development in children and raises blood pressure and kidney risk in adults. |
| Nitrate | EPA MCL 10 mg/L (as nitrogen) | 1 | 0 | Waterloo | Nitrate can cause methemoglobinemia ("blue baby syndrome") in infants under six months. |
Service line counts: EPA SDWIS Service Line Inventory, Q2 2026 snapshot (updated 2026-08-18). Limits: EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
How Iowa's 24 cities are distributed by water quality grade
22 out of 24 cities meet or exceed a B grade for water quality
Sorted by water quality score from best to worst. Click any city for a detailed water quality report.
| Rank | City | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Des Moines | 100/100 | A |
| 2 | Cedar Rapids | 100/100 | A |
| 3 | Ankeny | 100/100 | A |
| #4 | West Des Moines | 100/100 | A |
| #5 | Iowa City | 100/100 | A |
| #6 | Council Bluffs | 100/100 | A |
| #7 | Urbandale | 100/100 | A |
| #8 | Cedar Falls | 100/100 | A |
| #9 | Marshalltown | 100/100 | A |
| #10 | Fort Dodge | 100/100 | A |
| #11 | Johnston | 100/100 | A |
| #12 | North Liberty | 100/100 | A |
| #13 | Coralville | 100/100 | A |
| #14 | Ames | 99/100 | A |
| #15 | Mason City | 99/100 | A |
| #16 | Marion | 97/100 | A |
| #17 | Ottumwa | 96/100 | A |
| #18 | Waterloo | 94/100 | A |
| #19 | Burlington | 94/100 | A |
| #20 | Clinton | 94/100 | A |
| #21 | Davenport | 88/100 | B |
| #22 | Dubuque | 85/100 | B |
| #23 | Muscatine | 74/100 | C |
| #24 | Sioux City | 72/100 | C |
Sources: EPA SDWIS/ECHO violations and Lead and Copper Rule results (2026Q2 extract), UCMR5 PFAS occurrence (2023–2026), SYR4 compliance samples (2012–2019). Rubric v2 — methodology.
Found your city above? These guides turn its grade into an action plan.
Pitcher vs. under-sink vs. reverse osmosis, matched to the contaminants reported in Iowa systems.
Farm-runoff contamination, infant risk, and treatment options
Best filters for nitrates →Atrazine and other agricultural chemicals, and how to filter them
EPA's inventory of lead pipes by water system — a risk these plant-level grades cannot capture.
Put a Iowa city next to where you're moving from (or to) and see every contaminant head to head.
The best water quality in Iowa is found in Des Moines with a score of 100/100 and a grade of A. This puts Des Moines among the top-performing cities in the country for drinking water safety.
The most concerning water quality is in Sioux City scoring 72/100 with a grade of C. Residents may want to consider home water testing and filtration options.
The statewide average score is 96/100, which is 8 points above the national average of 88/100. A strong majority (83%) of Iowa cities exceed the national average, indicating generally good water infrastructure across the state.
Iowa tap water averages 96/100. Even with solid scores, a certified filter removes trace contaminants and improves taste — especially useful for households with young children or anyone sensitive to chlorine or lead.
Best for Multi-Contaminant Removal
APEC Reverse Osmosis System
Removes lead, PFAS, arsenic, nitrates, fluoride & 99%+ of contaminants. NSF certified.
Check Price on AmazonBest Pitcher Filter (Renter-Friendly)
ZeroWater 10-Cup Filter Pitcher
NSF 53 certified to reduce lead and chromium. No installation — fill from the tap and pour.
Check Price on AmazonWe may earn a commission when you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Des Moines has the best water quality grade among the 24 Iowa cities we can grade, with a score of 100/100 (grade A). Scores start at 100 and lose points for health-based EPA violations, lead 90th-percentile results, PFAS detections in EPA's UCMR5 monitoring and historical (2012–2019) readings near a limit. 13 cities share this top score; the largest system is listed first.
It varies by utility. Across the 24 Iowa cities we grade from EPA records, the average score is 96/100 and 92% earn a B or better. None has a health-based EPA violation in the last five years. No city grades below C. Lead from household plumbing is not captured by any city-level grade.
By population served: Des Moines grades A (100/100, #1 of 24); Davenport grades B (88/100, #21 of 24); Cedar Rapids grades A (100/100, #2 of 24); Sioux City grades C (72/100, #24 of 24); Ankeny grades A (100/100, #3 of 24). Each city report lists the utility's violations, lead 90th-percentile result and PFAS results.
Of the 24 graded Iowa cities, 0 cities have a D or F grade. Another 2 cities fall in the C range. 20 of 24 (83%) score above the national average of 88/100 across all graded U.S. cities in our dataset. 1 further Iowa city is not graded because we have not matched it to an EPA water system yet.
This page ranks 24 Iowa cities from EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (violations and lead results, 2026Q2), UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023–2026) and Six-Year Review sample data (2012–2019). Each city link opens a report with the utility's violation history, lead 90th-percentile results and PFAS table. For official Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR), contact your local water utility — federal law requires all community water systems to deliver an annual CCR to customers. The Iowa state environmental agency and the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) also publish official water quality data.
State water quality summary and key statistics
Top 20 cities with the cleanest water
Top-ranked cities nationwide
Cities with the most concerning water
Compare water quality across all 50 states
Side-by-side water quality comparison
Which contaminants show up in Iowa water
Certified filters matched to your contaminants