Loading water data...
Not health advice. Contact your local water utility for concerns.
Data from EPA Water Quality Reports. For official information, contact your water utility or health department.
Side-by-side comparison of tap water quality
| Metric | Atlanta | Charlotte | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 86/100 | 95/100 | Charlotte |
| Grade | A- | A+ | - |
| Contaminants Tested | 8 | 0 | - |
| Above EPA Limits | 0 | 0 | Tie |
| EPA Violations (Unresolved) | 0 | 0 | Tie |
| Water Source | surface | mixed | - |
| Population Served | 496,786 | 1,100,000 | - |
Side-by-side contaminant levels as percentage of EPA limits
| Contaminant | Atlanta | Charlotte | EPA Limit | Lower Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 0.597 mg/L (14.9% of limit) | Not tested | 4.00 mg/L | N/A |
| Nitrate | 1.19 mg/L (11.9% of limit) | Not tested | 10.00 mg/L | N/A |
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L (11.4% of limit) | Not tested | 0.015 mg/L | N/A |
| Mercury | 0.0002 mg/L (10.2% of limit) | Not tested | 0.0020 mg/L | N/A |
| Copper | 0.129 mg/L (9.9% of limit) | Not tested | 1.30 mg/L | N/A |
| Nitrite | 0.091 mg/L (9.1% of limit) | Not tested | 1.00 mg/L | N/A |
| Arsenic | 0.0003 mg/L (2.5% of limit) | Not tested | 0.010 mg/L | N/A |
| Haloacetic Acids | 1.45 ug/L (2.4% of limit) | Not tested | 60.00 ug/L | N/A |
Based on contaminants detected in each city
Atlanta's water quality is good. An activated carbon filter would improve taste and provide extra protection.
Charlotte's water quality is good. An activated carbon filter would improve taste and provide extra protection.
Charlotte outperforms Atlanta in overall water quality, scoring 95/100 compared to 86/100. This 9-point difference reflects meaningful distinctions in contaminant levels, EPA compliance history, and water infrastructure quality. The gap is driven by differences in source water protection, treatment technology, distribution system age, and the regulatory track record of each city's water utility. Residents in both cities should understand what these scores mean for their daily water use and health.
Atlanta draws from surface sources serving approximately 496,786 people, while Charlotte relies on mixed sources serving about 1,100,000 residents. The type of source water significantly affects the contaminants that must be addressed during treatment. Surface water sources such as rivers and reservoirs are more susceptible to agricultural runoff, microbial contamination, and seasonal turbidity, while groundwater sources may contain naturally occurring minerals like arsenic, radium, or fluoride depending on local geology. Both cities treat their water to meet EPA standards under the Safe Drinking Water Act, but the specific treatment processes and their effectiveness vary based on the challenges posed by each source.
Water quality scores are based on EPA SDWIS (Safe Drinking Water Information System) data, which tracks contaminant testing results, compliance violations, and system characteristics for every public water system in the United States. A higher score indicates fewer detected contaminants, better compliance with federal regulations, and stronger infrastructure. However, no water system is perfect, and conditions can change due to aging pipes, seasonal variations, upstream pollution events, or changes in treatment processes. Regardless of your city's score, monitoring your local utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report and considering point-of-use filtration are prudent steps for protecting your household's water quality.
Charlotte has better overall water quality with a score of 95/100 (Grade A+). Higher overall quality score (95 vs 86)
Yes, Atlanta's tap water generally meets EPA safety standards with a quality score of 86/100 (Grade A-).
Yes, Charlotte's tap water generally meets EPA safety standards with a quality score of 95/100 (Grade A+).
Water filters can provide additional protection and improve taste regardless of your city's water quality score. Both cities have good water quality, but a basic activated carbon filter can still improve taste.